Technology · Mid-level

ATS Software Engineer Resume Example

The same engineering history, rendered as plain single-column text an applicant tracking system can read without losing anything.

Alex Chen
Senior Software Engineer
San Francisco, CA · alex.chen@email.com · (555) 123-4567 · https://linkedin.com/in/alexchen

Professional Summary

Experienced software engineer with 5+ years developing scalable web applications and cloud infrastructure. Proven track record of leading cross-functional teams and delivering high-impact features that improve user experience and system performance.

Skills

JavaScript, TypeScript, React, Node.js, Python, AWS, Docker, Kubernetes, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, GraphQL, CI/CD, Microservices, System Design, Agile

Professional Experience

Senior Software Engineer
TechCorp Inc. · San Francisco, CA · Mar 2021 - Present
  • Led development of microservices architecture serving 10M+ daily active users, reducing latency by 40%
  • Architected and implemented real-time notification system using WebSockets, improving user engagement by 25%
  • Mentored 3 junior engineers and established code review best practices, increasing team productivity by 30%
  • Optimized database queries and implemented caching strategies, reducing API response time by 50%
  • Collaborated with product and design teams to deliver features on time with 95% test coverage
Software Engineer
StartupXYZ · San Francisco, CA · Jun 2019 - Feb 2021
  • Developed full-stack features using React and Node.js, contributing to 200% user growth
  • Built RESTful APIs and GraphQL endpoints, handling 1M+ requests per day
  • Implemented automated testing and CI/CD pipelines, reducing deployment time by 60%
  • Participated in agile ceremonies and sprint planning, delivering features consistently

Education

University of California, Berkeley
Bachelor of Science, Computer Science · 2018

Certifications

  • AWS Certified Solutions Architect, Amazon Web Services (Aug 2022)

Projects

Open Source Project Manager
Jan 2020 - Jun 2020 · github.com/alexchen/project-manager

Built a project management tool for open source contributions

Technologies: React, TypeScript, Node.js, PostgreSQL

Why a plain resume, and when to send one

An applicant tracking system does not see a page. It sees a stream of text, extracted in whatever order the parser walks the document, and anything that carries meaning visually rather than textually is either dropped or reordered on the way in. Columns interleave. Tables flatten. Text in a header or footer region is frequently discarded outright. Icons carry nothing at all.

That is why this version exists alongside the designed one. Send the plain file wherever an application asks you to upload a document, and keep the designed version for the recruiter who asks for one directly or for the interview loop, where a human is definitely the reader.

What changes, and what deliberately does not

One column, standard section headings, no graphics, and no layout that depends on where something sits on the page. Section names are the conventional ones, because a parser matches against a vocabulary it already knows and "Where I Have Worked" maps to nothing.

What does not change is the content. This is the same history with the presentation layer removed, and that is the point worth internalising: a plain resume is not a worse resume, and stripping the design does not cost you anything a machine was going to read anyway.

For an engineering resume specifically, the skills list matters more here than in the designed version, because the parser is matching literal strings. Write out both the framework and the language. A system that has been told to look for JavaScript will not credit you for React.

What survives parsing, and what does not

Dates in a consistent, unambiguous format survive. Ranges written three different ways on the same page produce a garbled employment history, and an unexplained gap generated by a parsing error is indistinguishable from a real one.

Links survive as text. Write the URL out rather than hiding it behind a label, because a hyperlink whose destination lives only in the file metadata reaches the reviewer as the word "GitHub" and nothing else.

What a reviewer checks first

  • Are the section headings the conventional ones a parser will recognise?
  • Are languages and frameworks both written out, not one implied by the other?
  • Is every date in the same format?
  • Are links written as URLs rather than hidden behind link text?

What this example demonstrates

ATS-optimized resume for software engineering roles. Plain text format with standard sections and keyword-rich content.

  • ATS-friendly format
  • Keyword optimized
  • Standard sections
  • Plain text layout
ATS Software Engineer Resume Example | Resumedit